‘Placing Backdoors Through Firewalls’


This article describes possible back-doors through different firewall architectures. However, the material can also be applied to other environments to describe how hackers cover their access to a system.’


‘The information has been provided by Sumy .
The original article can be found at: http://www.thc.org/papers/fw-backd.htm


‘Hackers often want to retain access to systems they have penetrated even in the face of obstacles such as new firewalls and patched vulnerabilities. To accomplish this the attackers must install a back-door which a) does it’s job and b) is not easily detectable. The kind of back-door needed depends on the firewall architecture used.

Firewall Architectures:
There are two basic firewall architectures and each has an enhanced version:

Packet Filters:
This is a host or router which checks each packet against an allow/deny rule-table before routing it through the correct interface. There are very simple ones which can only filter from the origin host, destination host and destination port, as well as good ones which can also decide based on incoming interface, source port, day/time and some TCP or IP flags. This could be a simple router, f.e. any Cisco, or a Linux machine with firewalling activated (ipfwadm).

Stateful Filters:
This is the enhanced version of a packet filter. It still does the same checking against a rule table and only routes if permitted, but it also keeps track of the state information such as TCP sequence numbers. Some pay attention to application protocols which allows tricks such as only opening ports to the interior network for ftp-data channels which were specified in a permitted ftp session. These filters can (more or less) get UDP packets (f.e. for DNS and RPC) securely through the firewall. (Thats because UDP is a stateless protocol. And it’s more difficult for RPC services.)
This could be a great OpenBSD machine with the ip-filter software, a Cisco Pix, Watchguard, or the (in)famous Checkpoint FW-1.

Proxies / Circuit Level Gateways:
A proxy as a firewall host is simply any server which has no routing activated and instead has proxy software installed. Examples of proxy servers which may be used are squid for WWW, a Sendmail relay configuration and/or just a socked.

Application Gateways:
This is the enhanced version of a proxy. Like a proxy, for every application which should get through the firewall a software must be installed and running to proxy it. However, the application gateway is smart and checks every request and answer, f.e. that an outgoing FTP only may download data but not upload any, and that the data has got no virus, no buffer overflows are generated in answers etc. One can argue that squid is an application gateway, because it does many sanity checks and let you filter stuff but it was not programmed for the installation in a secure environment and still has/had security bugs.

A good example for a freeware kit for this kind is the TIS firewall toolkit (fwtk).

Most firewalls that vendors sell on the market are hybrid firewalls, which means they’ve got more than just one type implemented; for example the IBM Firewall is a simple packet filter with socks and a few proxies. I won’t discuss which firewall product is the best, because this is not a how-to-by-a-firewall paper, but I will say this: application gateways are by far the most secure firewalls, although money, speed, special protocols, open network policies, stupidity, marketing hype and bad management might rule them out.’

Categories: Reviews